Midnight Pub

Bloatweb is an echo

~eaterofsheep

I stepped beyond the walls of this cute little pub, floated up into Gemini Space, ventured through the HTML gardens and hopped over the wall into the outside world. What I saw upset me greatly: computery-types may call it "bloat". But this is not the same species of "bloat" we hear so much about. This is an ancient evil, stretching back hundreds of years. An evil that has not only made me nauseous, but that has somehow convinced the rest of the world that is not bloat, but rather "beautiful".

I will be using https links to communicate with the beast here, ladies and gentlemen, I hope you don't mind.

First few examples:

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

Personally, I find more beauty in walls of clickbait Youtube thumbnails. This villain that plagues the Western mind, it insists on covering every surface with images, every space must be filled, every shape must be complexified. The respected architects of the past would design the tacky websites of the present, if only they were born in our time. This mindset turned once functionally-beautiful swords of Medieval times into, well...

Picture
Picture
Picture

For added effect, imagine being a member of a different civilisation, being skewered by one of these swords, as the Western world forces its ways in and your simpler "barbaric" ways out.

I wonder what what beautiful clothes people of this beautiful civilisation wore:

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

Western Civilisations unhealthy obsession with accentuating sexual dimorphism is a whole other topic on its own...

Okay, now I'm being nit-picky. I'm making fun of some ugly clothes like a catty character from Mean Girls. Let's do some reading:

Picture
Picture

Oh, perhaps not. I have nothing left to say. Would anyone like to play a game of Connect4? I always carry a pocket-sized set with me.


pink2ds

(For peeps who can't see, the pictures are examples of baroque, overly decorated, greeble-filled architecture, clothing, writing etc).

Yeah. I love a simple wooden bowl weathered with age and useā™„

Great points.

But can we separate baroque surface from baroque implementation?

"Medium" is a web page that's faux minimalist that looks clean but is a disgusting mess under the hood.

Similarly, a carpenter told me that beautifully minimal corners (such as the edge between wall and floor) are way more difficult than if you put some sort of covering there. When we complain about bloatweb, we complain more about under the hood (and all of that's consequences on accessibility and energy use) than the surface.

reply

marginalia

I do think you are cherry picking examples. There are other examples, also much part of western culture, of the opposite. Extreme asceticism well beyond what anyone would consider reasonable today.

Cynics like Diogenes is form one counter point. I don't think people today quite realize how big of a deal they were, culturally, as we get the wacky hijinks retold to us at best, but not their rationale. There's a speech by Roman Emperor Julian (a.k.a. Julian the Apostate), half a millennium after Diogenes' death, which lauded him as an example of virtue, as a defense of paganism against the enchroaching Christianity.

Christanity also had its roots in extreme asceticism. Early christians lived communaly and denounced private property, and the desert fathers that followed turned it up another several notches. These are the origins of western monasticism. Various anabaptists still follow their antimaterialist example. This is also very much western culture.

There are also, if you look, quite a good number of gawdy cultural expressions in other cultures. In Indian culture, in Chinese culture, in African culture, in Mesoamerican culture.

Western culture did not invent materialism or lavish displays of wealth.

reply

eaterofsheep

I confess, there is indeed some cherry picking on my part here. For the most part this is a cathartic late-night ramble which I regret losing sleep to make.

Another extreme example of Asceticism would be the Anchorites - mostly "Anchoresses" - who would voluntarily live alone in a church room with no escape, reading scripture and not a lot else until they died (well, they were already "dead to the world"). I find the idea of such a life very upsetting to even imagine!

However, I don't believe Christianity necessarily is Western. Certainly Christianity has influenced Western Civilisation, but that doesn't make early Christianity Western (sorry if you weren't suggesting that - just making sure) in the same way Judaism, which also influenced Western Civilsation, is not necessarily Western. I usually see these antimaterialist Christian tendencies as competing with or threatening Western ideas, hence the persecution of the Cathars.

Maybe I'm going into circular logic here. Maybe I am just seeing materialism as Western because I'm only categorising the materialistic ideas as truly Western. I don't know, I'll reflect on that more.

Sorry this message isn't nearly as well thought out or detailed as I'd like it to be, I have to catch up on some tasks. Thank you for your reply though, and I agree that there is gawdiness elsewhere in the world, even long before Western influence. I just felt like giving WestCiv a kicking as it seems to be dominant and worshipped, without the excuse of Xenophilia that attracts people to tasteless Indian, African, Chinese, etc. works.

reply

tskaalgard

This is why modernism is the way forward. Function over form.

reply

eaterofsheep

I don't know modernism very well, but I don't think there is enough reason in this post to limit yourself to modernism. There have always been groups valuing simplicity over complexity. There are exceedingly complex (ugly) pots from some neolithic cultures, and simple (tasteful) pots from others. Were the latter early farmers modernists?

reply

marginalia

Can't we have both?

reply

edisondotme

And in an ironic turn of events, "minimalism" is "high culture" like this New Yorker comic reminds me of

Picture
reply

nargran

Very good post!

I think all your examples have something in common, aside from horror vacui: function is no longer the main concern, showing status is. As you say, when swords were useful they weren't quite as ornate.

I'm not sure if the modern web is too different!

reply

chaote

Thanks for the post, that is food for thought...

Concerning the displayed weaponry, I find it quite interesting how we went from mere functionality in the middle ages to a baroque era where weapons are created to show off, and back to the mere functionality of murder nowadays. You could almost interpret baroque times and the 30-years-war as a phase where people aestheticized the tools of war and their surroundings in an effort to blind themselves to the cruel nature of their present reality. "memento mori", after all.

But my above statement is from a very Central European perspective. The folks collectively summed up as "vikings" nowadays have decorated their ships and houses with "bloat" even during medieval times, and examples of bloatism can be found throughout all kinds of other cultures as well, including those westerners and easterners wiped out/assimilated over time. Places of worship being the obvious examples.

All in all, I don't think that bloat is a bad thing, just a side effect of... well, of what? Are we painting our web with golden bloat because we are so rich we can afford to show it, or are we trying to hide something really ugly under the paint?

reply