AInight Pub?

The absurdity of considering election results are fine when so much else is corrupt is mind-boggling.

Elsewhere, I got a kick out of:

> Traditional workplace environments often require > neurodivergent individuals to constantly monitor > and adjust their communication and work styles, > leading to exhausting levels of self-censorship.

from:

Augmenting Neurodivergent Strengths: Generative AI for Self-Awareness and Meta-Cognition

because I feel that burden in spades when posting to the Pub.

(NOTE: That's most likely far more a statement about a weakness of mine than about the Pub and or its esteemed patrons.)

Still, reading more deeply into the article had me longing for interactions that might incur misunderstanding, but not judgement, ghosting, etc.

So I'm wondering about the eventual possibility of a site that has a backend that can generate some specified number of characters, whose have specified character traits, and then be posting while reading their posts, replying to their posts and/or replies, etc.

Or would specifying character attributes make it boring for having too much foreknowledge how interactions might go?

No idea. Just dreaming a bit.

wolfinthewoods

hmm

sounds dangerously

to what is usually

termed

'echo chamber'

i think

the true benefit

of any social place

be it online

or off

is that we encounter

divergence

and try and understand

other's views

i may not agree exactly

but i can accept

that you do

i would point out

that perhaps

the reason you sometimes

feel judgement

is because some of those views

are deeply unpopular

i wouldn't say it

reflects on your character

i think you're

a fine fellow

but some of

the sentiments

you've espoused are

things that many

are exhausted with

that is prevalent

in other

less fun

and more exhausting

parts of the internet

the signal to noise ratio

when it comes to

political discourse

and propaganda

across the spectrum

is off the charts

which makes such

discourse

close to impossible

people are getting their

info

or disinfo

from too many

sources to have

an agreed upon reality

me?

i'm a communist wolf

i can't stand the dems or repubs

it's all the same

bourgeoisie bullshit

which renders any

discussion moot on my end

on whether to go

for slightly more fascist capitalist

or slightly less fascist capitalist

in the end

it's really the same

but

i shy away from

online debate

i've grown weary of it

in my older years

too much

of a damn minefield

to navigate

inquiry

i will simply declare

without explanation

i see it working

all the time

say a statement is

for example

hate speech

without explaining why

it "is"

hate speech

i will simply say someone is

hitler

without explaining why

they "are"

hitler

i'll just say it

no need to explain

if asked why

i'll simply say it

again

and again

ad infinitum

because that's apparently

"how it's done"

where "it" is

demanding that others accept

one's own

reality

of course

one must first

have repeated it enough

to one's so-called

self

to have made it reality

to that self-referential

monstrosity

but that's all we are

which is why

it works

self-referentiality is a

while true

loop

at maximum

biological cpu

re-petition "is"

re-ality

pure

simple

i've learned from the masters

of npc self-hypnosis

and thus

and thereby

is the matter settled