Midnight Pub

of *course* we're time travelers

~inquiry

  fun performance
     age peers
        tips
       drinks
     accolades

   that was then

    this is now

       foggy
       groggy
digestive ambiguity
grasping at selfhood
    random urls
      may this
        soon
         be
        over

superfxchip

I did a gig last Friday at a weed shop, that was cool enough. Now I'm on my PC today typing about it a bit here lol smfh.

reply

tffb

"We now return to the part of The Internet Story(TM) where Inquiry re-re-realizes that yes, live music and human interaction is, indeed, more pleasurable and fulfilling than URL linking and opinionated correspondences"

Hope you're good, Inquiry! :)

reply

inquiry
> "We now return to the part of The
> Internet Story(TM) where Inquiry
> re-re-realizes that yes, live music
> and human interaction is, indeed,
> more pleasurable and fulfilling
> than URL linking and opinionated
> correspondences"

<lies pouty face down to kick and scream a bit>

But that's not how I want(ed) it to be!!!! :-)

Seriously. I simply wanted simple to be good. And what could be simpler than reducing reality down to the size of a screen seemingly infinitely deep in content? Add a keyboard and maybe a touch-sensitive device, the manipulation of which somewhat governs what appears on the screen. Still simple. Too simple for something to go wrong, to bow the Murphyric knee as it were. You think. Or I would. Or did. With the highest of ongoing hopes.

But, no. "F" no. Insufficiently biological. Illusory content depth. Same shit, different URL. Lucre-driven search result bubbles. Trying so hard to pretend narcissism is the same as community. All that link rot, and so much less....

> Hope you're good, Inquiry! :)

Better than the above sounds. :-)

reply

tffb

Yes, simpler/easier IS better, sometimes. It drove me to the long-standing conclusion that technology (in general - especially consumer tech) is running in direct opposition to Nature, itself. I mean, everything is a PART of nature, but in regards to biological interaction with (consumer) tech, it doesn't "scratch the itch" we think it will, or thought it would. I just sort of compartmentalize things (now I do, I used to try to make tech or/and the WWW a "part" of what I do in life, in the world (e.g. the AFK (Away From Keyboard) language, and whatnot), but now I realize that if I want "THIS" thing, I have to just go DO "THIS" thing, and not try to make someone else what it is not.

Sorry if some of that sounds obscure, but it's the best I would describe the scenario.

Glad to hear you're doing better than the above sounds. Later!

reply

inquiry

I'm tired of thinking too! :-)

reply

tetris

I was never in to the local band scene, despite living in a city that was full of them. It seemed like you just go to a pub on a Friday night, listen to what was going on, and bristle up against the true fans who have been religiously following the band for several years. The band would have a facebook page or a random url scribbled above a urinal.

Basically, I found the whole thing fun as an outsider, stumbling from pub to pub, but really damn hard to get into as a regular follower because of how much it relied on the internet for promotion. That being said, I've never seen a band live due to word of mouth, so I guess internet is the best option for this kind of thing.

reply

inquiry

I never did any of that for preferring recorded to live music. It's very rare I prefer a live version of a song to what I want to call its canonical version.

reply

tatterdemalion

I've come from 1973 to deliver this message: I'm jittery from too much coffee this morning.

reply

inquiry
  when I was only twelve
  it was a very good year
  it was a very good year
     for peace accords
     and expensive gas
  the books on the shelve
full of topics for to delve
  when I was only twelve
reply