I once had 20,000 followers on Google+, but I still only had six inches where it mattered.
I have no idea how many people pull my website's RSS feed because I've disabled HTTP logging, and I'm fine with that.
~
I once had 20,000 followers on Google+, but I still only had six inches where it mattered.
I have no idea how many people pull my website's RSS feed because I've disabled HTTP logging, and I'm fine with that.
You aren't the only one believing that follower counts only exist to foster the belief of insignificant people that they are more important than they actually are. It's just another social status indicator, though a far less reliable one – anyone can artificially boost their counts by buying bots, after all!
Let's see... cult leaders have followers. Hmmm....
Maybe to show who could be the best 'lil cult leader this side 'o the social network...?
gemini://textmonger.pollux.casa/
That's something I never thought about. It's public because it's for you make money with it. For You to be egotistic about it. It's ode to individualism, if I may say.